Los Angeles Deputy DA Steven Ipsen presented two conflicting sets of facts to the separate juries for each defendant.
Bringing killers to justice is one thing, but doing so by knowingly
presenting false evidence is another. That seemed to sum up California justices’
feelings Tuesday during oral arguments in a case in which a prosecutor is
accused of arguing contradictory theories in separate trials to win death
sentences against two men. More
The case briefs are available at the California Courts site.