<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Private Investigator Blog - Public Records, Internet Search - PI Buzz &#187; Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pibuzz.com/tag/legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pibuzz.com</link>
	<description>Private Investigator Blog - Public Records, Internet Search - PI Buzz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:47:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>California and Federal Legislation Affecting the Private Investigator</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2009/06/03/california-and-federal-legislation-affecting-the-private-investigator/</link>
		<comments>http://pibuzz.com/2009/06/03/california-and-federal-legislation-affecting-the-private-investigator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tamara Thompson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Investigator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/?p=1438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California legislation that the California Association of Licensed Investigators (CALI) is tracking: Protection of Consumers through Continuing Education SB 202 [Harman] Prohibitions against Use of Credit Report Information AB 943 [Mendoza] Meal and Rest Periods &#038; Licensed Private Investigators SB 287 [Calderon] and SB 380 [Dutton] Flexible Work Schedules AB 141 [Tran] and SB 187 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.cali-pi.org/associations/9732/files/legislation/cali-bills-apr-2009.pdf"target="_blank">California legislation</a></strong> that the California Association of Licensed Investigators (CALI) is tracking:</p>
<p>Protection of Consumers through Continuing Education<br />
SB 202 [Harman] </p>
<p>Prohibitions against Use of Credit Report Information<br />
AB 943 [Mendoza]</p>
<p>Meal and Rest Periods &#038; Licensed Private Investigators<br />
SB 287 [Calderon] and SB 380 [Dutton]</p>
<p>Flexible Work Schedules<br />
AB 141 [Tran] and SB 187 [Benoit]</p>
<p>Expansion of Paid Sick Days<br />
AB 1000 [Ma]</p>
<p>Fair Concealed Weapon Application Process<br />
AB 357 [Knight]</p>
<p>Timely Testing of DNA Specimens<br />
SB 439 [Wyland] </p>
<p>Insured’s Access to Accident Reports<br />
AB 470 [Niello]- Support</p>
<p>Peace Officer Identification<br />
SB 169 [Benoit]</p>
<p>Restrictions on Technology<br />
AB 255 [Anderson]</p>
<p>BSIS Posting of Accusations and Disciplinary Actions<br />
SB 599 [Negrete McCleod]</p>
<p>Federal legislation</a></strong> that the National Council of Investigation &#038; Security Services <a href="http://nciss.org/"target="_blank">(NCISS)</a> is tracking:</p>
<p>HR-2221 The &#8220;Data Accountability and Trust Act&#8221; by Rep. Bobby Rush (D-IL).  A hearing was held earlier this spring.  Rep. Rush has pledged to work with another subcommittee chairman on this and other issues relating to the Internet, leading to a vote this summer.</p>
<p>S-139 The &#8220;Data Breach Notification Act&#8221; by Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA). The bill is pending in the Senate Judiciary Committee.  Chairman Pat Leahy (D-VT) may introduced his own version of data breach legislation.  He pledged earlier this year to make privacy legislation a priority.</p>
<p>HR-122 &#8220;Protecting the Privacy of Social Security Numbers Act of 2009&#8243; by Rod Frelinghuysen (R-NJ).  We met with the Congressman&#8217;s staff to urge that an exemption be provided to permit investigators access to critical information.</p>
<p>S-141 &#8220;Protecting the Privacy of Social Security Numbers Act&#8221; by Senator Feinstein. Although the bill includes a helpful exception for &#8220;business to business&#8221; transactions, NCISS is urging a more specific exemption.</p>
<p>HR-1529  &#8220;Second Chance for Ex-Offenders Act&#8221; by Rep Charles Rangel (D-NY). The bill would provide for expungement of federal criminal records.</p>
<p>S-30 &#8220;Truth in Caller ID Act&#8221;  The bill prohibits &#8220;spoofing&#8221; with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value&#8221;.</p>
<p>HR-1409/S560, the &#8220;Employee Free Choice Act&#8221;  This major labor reform would deny employers the right to obtain a secret ballot vote for organizing efforts and would impose binding arbitration in when no first agreement can be reached.  It is labor&#8217;s top priority and the fight is led by the SEIU which has attempted to organize guard companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pibuzz.com/2009/06/03/california-and-federal-legislation-affecting-the-private-investigator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Chills Employment Investigations</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2009/04/22/new-york-chills-employment-investigations/</link>
		<comments>http://pibuzz.com/2009/04/22/new-york-chills-employment-investigations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tamara Thompson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/?p=1343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The phrase &#8220;personal information&#8221; and &#8220;identity theft&#8221; have become so intertwined that legislatures have rushed to implement laws which have detrimental outcomes for investigations. Recently codified New York law would subject employers to a $500 penalty for disclosing &#8220;personal identifying information&#8221; on employees. This will have a chilling effect on release by employers of other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phrase &#8220;personal information&#8221; and &#8220;identity theft&#8221; have become so intertwined that legislatures have rushed to implement laws which have detrimental outcomes for investigations. <strong><a href="http://public.leginfo.state.ny.us/LAWSSEAF.cgi?QUERYTYPE=LAWS+&#038;QUERYDATA=$$LAB203-D$$@TXLAB0203-D+&#038;LIST=LAW+&#038;BROWSER=06100142+&#038;TOKEN=38686077+&#038;TARGET=VIEW"target="_blank">Recently codified New York law</a></strong> would subject employers to a $500 penalty for disclosing &#8220;personal identifying information&#8221; on employees. This will have a chilling effect on release by employers of other information on current or past employees, such as name and job title. This is reminiscent of the California legislature&#8217;s <a href="http://leginfo.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0301-0350/sb_328_bill_20070409_amended_sen_v98.html"target="_blank">failed attempt in 2007</a> to penalize the release of &#8220;personal information about a customer or employee contained in the records of a business&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>It is now a violation of New York law to,</p>
<blockquote><p>Communicate an employee&#8217;s personal identifying information to the general public. For purposes  of  this  section,  &#8220;personal  identifying information&#8221;  shall  include  social  security  number,  home address or telephone   number,   personal electronic   mail   address, Internet identification name or password, parent&#8217;s surname prior to marriage, or drivers&#8217; license number.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Hat Tip: <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3ef3c82a-8459-4950-b5a3-d19201a09843"target="_blank">Lexology</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pibuzz.com/2009/04/22/new-york-chills-employment-investigations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

