<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Private Investigator Blog - Public Records, Internet Search - PI Buzz &#187; District Attorney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pibuzz.com/tag/district-attorney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pibuzz.com</link>
	<description>Private Investigator Blog - Public Records, Internet Search - PI Buzz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:47:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Public Records, Not Public Records and Private Investigators</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2009/05/17/public-records-not-public-records-and-private-investigators/</link>
		<comments>http://pibuzz.com/2009/05/17/public-records-not-public-records-and-private-investigators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 05:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tamara Thompson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Investigator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Bernardino]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/?p=1406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Government agencies won&#8217;t put public records on the Internet but the former Santa Bernardino County Assessor found a technological runaround to making his emails a public record. A private investigator and the former supervisor of the Worthless Check Division in the St.Tammany (Louisiana) District Attorney’s Office were sentenced to three years’ probation for buying and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government agencies won&#8217;t put public records on the Internet but the former <a href="http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_blackberry17.47256e1.html"target="_blank">Santa Bernardino County Assessor found a technological runaround</a> to making his emails a public record.</p>
<p>A private investigator and the former supervisor of the Worthless Check Division in the St.Tammany (Louisiana) District Attorney’s Office were <a href="http://www.slidellsentry.com/articles/2009/05/17/news/doc4a0f6cab46dc9760034116.txt"target="_blank">sentenced to three years’ probation</a> for buying and selling criminal information from the National Crime Information Center database. The DA employee got the heavier sentence &#8212; she also lost her job.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.supremecourt.ne.gov/opinions/2009/may/may15/s08-339.pdf"target="_blank">Nebraska Supreme Court ruling</a>: Burial records from a state run cemetery are a public record. The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) claimed that the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) applied because the cemetery was for residents at a former  psychiatric hospital. But the court noted that HIPAA allows for the  disclosure of protected health information when required by state law, and that Nebraska’s public records laws trumped HIPAA because these are death records, which are open records. <a href="http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=10756"target="_blank"><em>Reported by RCFP</em>.</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://watchdogblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/05/more-information-on-the-dob-is.html"target="_blank">Texas media, private investigators and genealogists are opposing the efforts of the Texas legislature</a> to exempt the dates of birth of government employees from disclosure as a public record. The media has uncovered misdeeds by employees of the Texas Youth Commission &#8212; matching dates of birth with employee names &#8212; involving abuse of people and the public trust. Shielding dates of birth in public records does not protect the public from identity theft, as legislatures claim when attempting to carve out more public record exemptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pibuzz.com/2009/05/17/public-records-not-public-records-and-private-investigators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

