December 31st, 2007

This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington

Town registrars in Massachusetts publish an annual “street list” of local resident names, dates of birth, occupations, veteran status and nationality, which has been a public record. A state Senate bill would change that status, from one of a public record, to one that is only available for federal, state and local governmental use. [Story: Public listings could go private, Matt Murphy, Eagle Boston Bureau]

The common practice of treating search warrants as public records comports with the law, according to an Opinion issued by the Illinois Attorney General. Once the warrants have been returned to the court they are part of the court record and must be available for public inspection.The Sangamon County State’s Attorney backed the Circuit Clerk, who was apparently one of the few court clerks denying the public access to the executed search warrants. As one of this story’s commentators noted, “at some point they have to be made public because it is the public’s dollars which finance them. Making it clear that every search warrant will eventually become public keeps those issuing them honest. We do want judges issuing them and police seeking them kept honest don’t we?”

A Washington State school district narrowly won support from the state Supreme Court in a decision that pitted the Public Records Act against attorney-client privilege for government agencies. Perhaps most damaging to open government, noted in the Justices’ dissent, is the aspect of the ruling allows agencies to seek a judicial determination as to whether a requested public record must be disclosed.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington digg:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington spurl:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington wists:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington simpy:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington newsvine:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington blinklist:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington furl:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington reddit:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington fark:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington blogmarks:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington Y!:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington smarking:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington magnolia:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington segnalo:This week in public records: Massachusetts - Illinois - Washington
December 2nd, 2007

This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida

Nevada Supreme Court Schedules Public Hearing on Proposed Rules to Govern Sealing and Redacting of Court Records in Civil Cases.

Names of those arrested and detained in an immigration raid must be disclosed, as ordered by the Connecticut Freedom of Information Commission. Documents were retained by the state’s Department of Public Safety, which made them subject to disclosure under the Connecticut open records law .

Washington State DOC to Seek Public Input in Development of New Electronic Disclosure Rules.

A Florida judge overruled a local school board in determining that the names of all school employees enrolled in the deferred retirement plan must be released under the state’s public records law.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida digg:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida spurl:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida wists:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida simpy:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida newsvine:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida blinklist:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida furl:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida reddit:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida fark:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida blogmarks:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida Y!:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida smarking:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida magnolia:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida segnalo:This week in public records: Nevada - Connecticut - Washington - Florida
August 26th, 2007

The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web

The citizenry and government both come to the wrong conclusions about the ready availability of public records on the Internet. The City of Raleigh, North Carolina and Wake County joined dozens of other communities that have begun integrating crime activity into interactive mapping. Local real estate developers and agents object, believing that “public crime data… will lower housing prices.” Some people are getting acquainted with the meaning of “public records” for the first time through the government Web sites, complaining about an invasion of privacy because others can see their address and name in the Assessor’s records. Alternatively, they embrace access when the records concern people they want to know about, such as sex offenders. Privacy advocates have campaigned to seal criminal records for first-time offenders, which Florida is doing at 3 times the number as 10 years ago, according to this analysis. Even in these cases, law enforcement continues to keep a record of the criminal history.

Public officials sometimes sound defensive when bringing public records into the Internet age, asserting that particular types of personal information isn’t included. Or they remove the documents or data that was once on the Web, as in the case of the El Paso County, Colorado inmate log. The Sheriff has restricted the listing of the criminal charges to classification numbers as a reaction to inmate assaults. If the availability of public records on the Internet isn’t mandated by law, as in the case of the sex offender registries, it’s always subject to being withdrawn.

Agencies could better serve the goal of open government by reducing the number of exemptions to disclosure. The Washington State Attorney General announced a meeting to review the Public Disclosures Act exemptions, which have grown from 10 in 1972 to more than 300 today.

The County Clerk of Oneida County, New York removed land records from its Web site, a promise of her political campaign. Now, she proposes to make document images available online to a handpicked elite, including attorneys (to whom she was speaking when this offer was made), ostensibly because the records are used in the course of their work. You see the basis for redefining the “public” in “public records”, right? Arbitrary. Capricious. Preferential.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web digg:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web spurl:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web wists:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web simpy:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web newsvine:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web blinklist:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web furl:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web reddit:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web fark:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web blogmarks:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web Y!:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web smarking:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web magnolia:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web segnalo:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web
July 7th, 2007

New sources, More activity on state employee salaries

Salaries of Delaware state employees who are paid with non public funds are not public records, according to an opinion issued this year by the Delaware Attorney General. Delaware State University solicited the opinion in response to a Freedom of Information request. At the time the AG assessed the University’s accounting system he concluded that it coded employee records to distinguish between employees paid with private money and those receiving payments from public funds. The determination is particularly troubling because the two employees on whom the data was requested are both state legislators.[Reported in The Chronicle of Higher Education.]

Of course, any public agency can follow the example of the North Carolina Columbus County Board of Commissioners and bury a public record in a confidential personnel file, then declare - mistakenly - that it’s not a public record.

Search collections of Washington State and Washington cities employee salary databases at this private Web site. Search statewide or within a city or agency. Data is collected for some sources for as much as 7 years. The site also has other databases and links to Washington State government databases for voters, real property ownership, inmates, court filings, restaurant inspections, recorded documents and newspaper name searches.


This South Dakota newspaper did a round-up of each state’s policy on release of government employee names and their pay
, and whether an online searchable database was available. It would be a better reference tool if the site had provided hyperlinks to the state salary databases that are online.

Read prior PI buzz postings on databases and issues related to government employee salaries.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries digg:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries spurl:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries wists:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries simpy:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries newsvine:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries blinklist:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries furl:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries reddit:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries fark:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries blogmarks:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries Y!:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries smarking:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries magnolia:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries segnalo:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries
June 30th, 2007

This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a ruling that could advance employee rights to privacy protection of their personal email generated at a workplace computer.

In Warshak v. United States, the federal court upheld the finding that e-mail users are entitled to the same expectation of privacy as persons using the telephone.

“Employers should be aware that the Sixth Court did not state that a workplace-monitoring policy will always defeat an employee’s expectation of privacy. If, for example, a company representative with appropriate authority tells an employee that the company will not read his e-mail despite the existence of a policy to the contrary, the employee may be able to argue that he did have a reasonable expectation [of privacy] in his work e-mail,” he cautioned.

“It also is possible that an employee who becomes aware of his employer’s practice not to enforce its right to monitor e-mail may be able to show that he had an expectation of privacy in his e-mail,” Gordon concluded.

For all of these reasons, said Martin Jaron, litigation partner at Holland & Knight and cochair of its electronic discovery team, this decision is just a way station in the broader discussion of privacy rights.

A Washington State Superior Court denied a request for an injunction that would have required a state agency to produce public records in electronic form. Thurston County Judge Christine Pomeroy directed the requester to seek legislative clarification, that electronic copies of records are not currently required to be produced under the Public Disclosure Act.

Inmates in Iowa jails for 23 counties are now on the Vinelink notification service. More counties and the Department of Corrections inmates will be added later this year.

The Wisconsin State Journal is suing a police department for access to police officer employment and disciplinary records. A public records request for copies of complaints brought against a particular officer was denied by the law enforcement agency.

The Oakland, California police department is in the process of updating its public records policies and training procedures. The department is also installing cameras in their patrol cars and, in this article, the records supervisor mentions that these videos will be available under the Public Records Act. Last year, Californians Aware conducted a survey of several hundred California law enforcement agencies to determine their openness to releasing records covered under the Public Records Act. The Oakland Police Department was among the agencies receiving the lowest score.

The sex offender registry for Tennessee has added a mapping program, which will go online July 1, enabling a radius search. Changes in the laws this year will increase the number of offenders required to register, make more names public that have been considered confidential and require all those convicted of a sex crime in the past, regardless of the date, to register by August 1st.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that a prison telephone audiotape recording was a public record because it was played in an open court hearing. Even though the recording did not meet the evidence requirements to be submitted at trial it was nevertheless a judicial record.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania digg:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania spurl:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania wists:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania simpy:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania newsvine:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania blinklist:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania furl:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania reddit:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania fark:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania blogmarks:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania Y!:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania smarking:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania magnolia:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania segnalo:This week in public records: Federal - Washington - Iowa - Wisconsin - California - Tennessee - Pennsylvania
May 31st, 2007

This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania

A few months ago I wrote about the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control maintains License Query System. An added feature to the ABC site is daily, weekly and annual reports of new licenses, license status changes and actions taken against licenses including, revocations, suspensions, fines, and issuance or denial of licenses. The database of reports cannot be searched at the site. Search the archived reports from September 16, 2006 to the present by using this advanced search at Google. Replace “Safeway” with your company name, address or other key words.

safeway site:www.abc.ca.gov/reports/

Reporters and anyone compiling statistical data will be able to make use of the reports menu at the ABC site. Query the reports by location and license type to get a detail of all that meet that criteria. For example, find all the caterer licensees in Azusa.

Washington State law now bans employer access to the credit reports of employees or potential employees unless such information is substantially related to the individual’s current or potential job responsibilities. An exception is made if the employer has a “reasonable cause to believe” that the employee “has engaged in specific activity that constitutes a violation of law.”

Missouri private investigators are poised to receive the stamp of legitimacy with the establishment of the Board of Private Investigator Examiners, which will license and regulate private investigators. The bill is awaiting the governor’s signature, which is expected this summer. The Missouri Association of Private Investigators has worked diligently to secure state level licensing and soon they’ll be able to join the majority of states that license PIs.

New regulations for Indiana private investigators will go into effect July 1, including the replacement of the term “private detective” with “private investigator”.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court will decide whether property assessment databases created on behalf of municipalities by private companies are a public records.

Legislation introduced in Pennsylvania would make it a crime to obtain, sell or receive phone records of state residents without their authorization.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania digg:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania spurl:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania wists:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania simpy:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania newsvine:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania blinklist:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania furl:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania reddit:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania fark:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania blogmarks:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania Y!:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania smarking:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania magnolia:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania segnalo:This week in public records: California - Washington - Missouri - Indiana - Wisconsin - Pennsylvania
February 21st, 2007

Find employees through restaurant inspection reports

A faithful reader clued me into the usefulness of restaurant inspection reports for finding names of employees at a business. Search the Sacramento County, California Food Facility Restaurant Inspection Reports database by partial street name or facility name. The reports often identify the owners and employees who signed the inspection report.

You may have to do some hunting around to get to the food inspection databases for these California counties. This cached site has more direct links to restaurant inspection reports and closures. Go to the web sites for a state Department of Public Health to find the county environmental health division.

Some states, like Virginia, are kind, and have direct links to each county database of inspections. There doesn’t seem to be a site that keeps a comprehensive collection of these links. Even the State of Washington Office of Environmental Health and Safety lists only 6 counties.

Add your local or state site to this posting’s comments.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports digg:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports spurl:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports wists:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports simpy:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports newsvine:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports blinklist:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports furl:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports reddit:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports fark:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports blogmarks:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports Y!:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports smarking:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports magnolia:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports segnalo:Find employees through restaurant inspection reports
January 15th, 2007

This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina

The San Joaquin Recorder now has its index online.

The Spokane County, Washington Sheriff’s Office has added a roster of current inmates to its Website. Search by name to get inmate details.

The Wyoming connection to Vinelink is expanding and eventually will cover all counties, parole boards and the state Department of Corrections. Cheyenne is expected to be online within 6 months.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that federal prosecutors can withhold witness names.

Prosecutors gave defense attorneys parts of the reports, but withheld sections that could reveal the names of witnesses. They argued the reports were covered by a federal court rule protecting the work of “government agents” and that revealing the names could endanger witnesses who are project residents.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the report sections could be withheld because the police qualified as government agents, even though they weren’t federal employees.

A private law firm representing a town in North Carolina must still comply with the open records laws, according to a state appeals court.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina digg:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina spurl:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina wists:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina simpy:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina newsvine:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina blinklist:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina furl:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina reddit:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina fark:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina blogmarks:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina Y!:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina smarking:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina magnolia:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina segnalo:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina
November 26th, 2006

Free Real Property Multiple Listing Service address searches and maps

San Francisco real property sales from the Multiple Listing Service are searchable by address, address range, neighborhood, property profile, real estate agent or agency. Property profiles show a street view and interior photographs. Select the agent link to view all properties for that agent on the MLS.

Trulia.com is more geographically far reaching, covering cities and towns nationwide but it isn’t as comprehensive as the MLS. Use the “advanced search” tool to restrict the search by address or to include multiple towns (there’s no county option).

Check for regional sites, such as Redfin, which covers the San Francisco Bay Area and Seattle, Washington, for more extensive listings and property options. Redfin MLS properties can be searched by address or neighborhood. Properties are plotted on a map, so you can view other nearby sales. The site also covers past property sales.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:Free Real Property Multiple Listing Service address searches and maps digg:Free Real Property Multiple Listing Service address searches and maps spurl:Free Real Property Multiple Listing Service address searches and maps wists:Free Real Property Multiple Listing Service address searches and maps simpy:Free Real Property Multiple Listing Service address searches and maps newsvine:Free Real Property Multiple Listing Service address searches and maps blinklist:Free Real Property Multiple Listing Service address searches and maps furl:Free Real Property Multiple Listing Service address searches and maps reddit:Free Real Property Multiple Listing Service address searches and maps fark:Free Real Property Multiple Listing Service address searches and maps