March 30th, 2008

This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota

The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania is formulating new policies regarding public access to court case files. The Notice from the court highlights the proposed removal of Social Security numbers and bank account numbers from future court files. The public can submit comments by email, which are due by May 28, 2008.

The New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on Public Access to Court Records recently solicited comments on its proposed policy changes. Read the submitted comments and the report on policy changes.

An Opinion issued by the North Dakota Attorney General confirms that email messages from government employees “acting within the scope of their public positions” are public records “regardless of whether it is located at their private homes or businesses.”

Last year, I wrote about a similar determination by the Idaho Supreme Court and the Arkansas Supreme Court. The courts, not the government entity, must determine whether public employees’ emails are private, according to the Arizona Supreme Court.

Read a recent round-up of other state court decisions: Are public employee e-mails secret?, The Des Moines Register, March 18, 2008.

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press tracks public records news. Subscribe by email or RSS.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota digg:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota spurl:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota wists:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota simpy:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota newsvine:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota blinklist:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota furl:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota reddit:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota fark:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota blogmarks:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota Y!:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota smarking:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota magnolia:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota segnalo:This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota
May 9th, 2007

This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem

Courts

The North Dakota Supreme Court district court calendars and court case information can be searched by name, citation number, or case number. Municipal court case information is also available for Bismarck, Mandan, Dickinson, Williston, Minot, Devils Lake, Jamestown, Wahpeton, and West Fargo. Supreme Court Announcement

Crime

The Rhode Island Department of Corrections Inmate Search provides details for those currently incarcerated in either a Rhode Island or out of state prison or under home confinement. The database can be searched by partial name and returns an extensive amount of data on past convictions. [Reported in beSpacific]

Search Engines

DormItem is a Craigslist for colleges. Search within a school or across all listed schools by keyword to find people who are selling stuff or have apartments for rent.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem digg:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem spurl:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem wists:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem simpy:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem newsvine:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem blinklist:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem furl:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem reddit:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem fark:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem blogmarks:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem Y!:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem smarking:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem magnolia:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem segnalo:This week in Internet search: ND Courts, RI DOC, DormItem
February 16th, 2007

This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota

The Florida Sexual Offenders and Predators database is now available en Español.

The public’s right to access public records supersedes laws relieving government agencies from compiling new records, according to a recent North Dakota Attorney General Opinion. The Department of Transportation denied a request for records by Carfax, although the state public records access law requires that “an electronically stored record under this section [44-04-18], or a copy thereof, must be provided at the requester’s option in either a printed document or through any other available medium.” ND DOT responded that it wasn’t required to create or compile a record that does not exist. The Attorney General disagreed, requiring corrective measures be instituted within 7 days.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota digg:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota spurl:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota wists:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota simpy:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota newsvine:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota blinklist:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota furl:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota reddit:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota fark:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota blogmarks:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota Y!:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota smarking:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota magnolia:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota segnalo:This week in public records - Florida - North Dakota
July 30th, 2006

This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona

Pennsylvania district judges were upbraided by the administrator for the state courts for redacting court files without any legal authority.

The North Dakota Attorney General ruled against a county Sheriff for rejecting a public records request without citing any legal authority. The AG also noted that the Sheriff obstructed the requester’s objective by not pointing out that the records existed in a form other than the one identified in the record request.

An online database of stolen vehicles in Arizona can be searched by license plate number or VIN. The site is operated by the Arizona Attorney General.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona digg:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona spurl:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona wists:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona simpy:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona newsvine:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona blinklist:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona furl:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona reddit:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona fark:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona blogmarks:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona Y!:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona smarking:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona magnolia:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona segnalo:This week in public records - Pennsylvania - North Dakota - Arizona
July 1st, 2006

North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services

A private security company operating in North Dakota may review a videotape to detect theft but only a licensed private investigator “may investigate to determine a
person’s conduct”, according to a recent opinion issued by the North Dakota attorney general.

Therefore, it is my opinion that a private security service may not review videotapes after the fact to determine what activity took place because that activity constitutes “investigating,” which requires a private investigative service license. Whether any particular activity is “investigating” rather than providing “security service” is usually a question of fact on which this office will not opine.12 However, since the information on the gaming reports at issue generally does not involve theft or the detection of theft, it is my opinion that the review of videotapes after the fact in order to ascertain sufficient information to complete those gaming reports clearly falls outside providing a “security service” and is an investigative activity which requires a private investigative service license.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services digg:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services spurl:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services wists:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services simpy:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services newsvine:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services blinklist:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services furl:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services reddit:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services fark:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services blogmarks:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services Y!:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services smarking:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services magnolia:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services segnalo:North Dakota AG addresses distinction between security and investigative services
February 22nd, 2006

North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies

The North Dakota Attorney General has issued an opinion that a privately operated arts organization that received public funds is subject to the state’s open meetings and public records act. Read the rest of this entry »

Pass it on: del.icio.us:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies digg:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies spurl:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies wists:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies simpy:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies newsvine:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies blinklist:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies furl:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies reddit:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies fark:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies blogmarks:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies Y!:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies smarking:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies magnolia:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies segnalo:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies