August 26th, 2007

The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web

The citizenry and government both come to the wrong conclusions about the ready availability of public records on the Internet. The City of Raleigh, North Carolina and Wake County joined dozens of other communities that have begun integrating crime activity into interactive mapping. Local real estate developers and agents object, believing that “public crime data… will lower housing prices.” Some people are getting acquainted with the meaning of “public records” for the first time through the government Web sites, complaining about an invasion of privacy because others can see their address and name in the Assessor’s records. Alternatively, they embrace access when the records concern people they want to know about, such as sex offenders. Privacy advocates have campaigned to seal criminal records for first-time offenders, which Florida is doing at 3 times the number as 10 years ago, according to this analysis. Even in these cases, law enforcement continues to keep a record of the criminal history.

Public officials sometimes sound defensive when bringing public records into the Internet age, asserting that particular types of personal information isn’t included. Or they remove the documents or data that was once on the Web, as in the case of the El Paso County, Colorado inmate log. The Sheriff has restricted the listing of the criminal charges to classification numbers as a reaction to inmate assaults. If the availability of public records on the Internet isn’t mandated by law, as in the case of the sex offender registries, it’s always subject to being withdrawn.

Agencies could better serve the goal of open government by reducing the number of exemptions to disclosure. The Washington State Attorney General announced a meeting to review the Public Disclosures Act exemptions, which have grown from 10 in 1972 to more than 300 today.

The County Clerk of Oneida County, New York removed land records from its Web site, a promise of her political campaign. Now, she proposes to make document images available online to a handpicked elite, including attorneys (to whom she was speaking when this offer was made), ostensibly because the records are used in the course of their work. You see the basis for redefining the “public” in “public records”, right? Arbitrary. Capricious. Preferential.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web digg:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web spurl:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web wists:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web simpy:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web newsvine:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web blinklist:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web furl:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web reddit:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web fark:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web blogmarks:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web Y!:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web smarking:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web magnolia:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web segnalo:The roller coaster conversation about public records on the Web
July 29th, 2007

This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina

The Missouri Attorney General has unveiled a database of filed consumer complaints that can be searched by company name or partial name.The database includes more than 100,000 complaints filed since January 1, 2004. View the complaint number, type of complaint, the number of complaints and the date filed. The site does not provide any information on whether the complaint was pursued by the Attorney General or what the result of any investigation might have been.

The Tennessee Sexual Offender Registry has been expanded to include mapping and photographs of all offenders, and more offenders than were previously on the Web site. Registry of sex offenders expanding, Chattanooga Times Free Press, July 27, 2007.

In advance of any state law, the Rockland County, New York Clerk has installed software that will remove Social Security numbers from the online version of recorded documents. According to this article, New York state tax liens now use a different number than the Social Security number on documents.

A bill signed by the governor of North Carolina will marginally facilitate the reconnection of birth parents and the children they relinquished for adoption. If both parties agree, the adoption placement services will act as confidential intermediaries, providing the birth parents and adult children with each other’s contact information.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina digg:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina spurl:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina wists:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina simpy:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina newsvine:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina blinklist:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina furl:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina reddit:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina fark:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina blogmarks:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina Y!:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina smarking:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina magnolia:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina segnalo:This week in public records: Missouri - Tennessee - New York - North Carolina
July 7th, 2007

New sources, More activity on state employee salaries

Salaries of Delaware state employees who are paid with non public funds are not public records, according to an opinion issued this year by the Delaware Attorney General. Delaware State University solicited the opinion in response to a Freedom of Information request. At the time the AG assessed the University’s accounting system he concluded that it coded employee records to distinguish between employees paid with private money and those receiving payments from public funds. The determination is particularly troubling because the two employees on whom the data was requested are both state legislators.[Reported in The Chronicle of Higher Education.]

Of course, any public agency can follow the example of the North Carolina Columbus County Board of Commissioners and bury a public record in a confidential personnel file, then declare - mistakenly - that it’s not a public record.

Search collections of Washington State and Washington cities employee salary databases at this private Web site. Search statewide or within a city or agency. Data is collected for some sources for as much as 7 years. The site also has other databases and links to Washington State government databases for voters, real property ownership, inmates, court filings, restaurant inspections, recorded documents and newspaper name searches.


This South Dakota newspaper did a round-up of each state’s policy on release of government employee names and their pay
, and whether an online searchable database was available. It would be a better reference tool if the site had provided hyperlinks to the state salary databases that are online.

Read prior PI buzz postings on databases and issues related to government employee salaries.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries digg:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries spurl:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries wists:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries simpy:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries newsvine:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries blinklist:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries furl:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries reddit:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries fark:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries blogmarks:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries Y!:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries smarking:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries magnolia:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries segnalo:New sources, More activity on state employee salaries
June 20th, 2007

This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota

The Los Angeles County Superior Court has ruled that church personnel files of priests accused of molesting children may be released to the public, whether or not there was a criminal prosecution. The decision affects a small number of clergy but tips the balance in favor of the public right to know over privacy, which could affect many other cases.

Santa Clara County, California is continuing to fight a Superior Court determination that its GIS mapping should be easily available to the public at low cost. Meanwhile, Greenwich, Connecticut has assented to that state’s Supreme Court ruling and will post aerial photographs of the town on its Web site. Both government agencies used the specious defense that freely available geographic information systems maps were a security risk.

Folks in North Carolina may want to comment at the blog of a county Register who removed vital records from the Internet, then wrote about it.

The state police can demand lists of email activity conducted by a business if they deem it relevant to an investigation, according to an opinion by the Nebraska Attorney General. This includes “non content” records retained by providers of electronic communication services, such as ISP records of email headers, but not the email message.

Search the New York local civil court records by index number, party name, attorney/firm or judge. Some courts are online now and others will be added through the year.

Appeals filed with the Minnesota Supreme Court and the Minnesota Court of Appeals are now searchable online. More extensive information is available for cases filed after March 2003.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota digg:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota spurl:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota wists:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota simpy:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota newsvine:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota blinklist:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota furl:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota reddit:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota fark:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota blogmarks:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota Y!:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota smarking:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota magnolia:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota segnalo:This week in public records: California - Connecticut - North Carolina - Nebraska - New York - Minnesota
June 13th, 2007

This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona

The Ohio Office of Homeland Security, which licenses security guards, is having trouble keeping an accurate count of licensees since a recent requirement went into effect that employers register each new security guard hire. [State system doesn’t allow exact accounting of security guards, CantonRep.com, May 29, 2007.]

The state estimates about 21,000 individuals holding security guard licenses but says that number could be inflated by as much as 3,000 since employees are registered each time they go to work for a new company, meaning some could be registered multiple times.

Meanwhile, changes in access to public records in Ohio may make it difficult for even law enforcement to do background checks. Recently passed legislation shields personal information in public records on some government employees and their family members.

The New York Drug Dealer Registry Act, recently introduced legislation, would require drug dealers with felony convictions to register upon release from prison.

The North Carolina Court of Appeal ruled against a newspaper that sought clemency appeal applications under the state public records law. [North Carolina Appeals Court Holds That Public Records Act Does Not Apply to Clemency Applications, Media Law Prof, June 7, 2007]

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court agrees with the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review that juror names are releasable under the state public records act. The newspaper was rebuffed in its request for juror addresses. [Names of criminal trial jurors are public, RCFP, June 5, 2007]

The Arizona Court of Appeal agreed with Phoenix Newspaper, Inc. that a claim for damages made against a school district is a public record, even in the case of a rape of a minor. [Ruling: Rape victim’s compensation claim public record, Arizona Republic, June 12, 2007]

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona digg:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona spurl:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona wists:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona simpy:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona newsvine:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona blinklist:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona furl:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona reddit:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona fark:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona blogmarks:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona Y!:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona smarking:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona magnolia:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona segnalo:This week in public records: Ohio - New York - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Arizona
May 27th, 2007

This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina

The Tennessee Supreme Court has overturned the law enforcement privilege in the state public records act, making police field interview cards, which The Jackson Sun newspaper had sought, available under the Public Records Act.

The Colorado governor will likely sign a bill next month that will enable people to seal their court records pertaining to charges that were dismissed, not filed or when the defendant is acquitted. The RCFP story

Proposed legislation in North Carolina would redact personal information from vehicle crash reports, make failure to disclose public records a misdemeanor, restrict from discovery prosecutors’ witness interviews and names of confidential informants, and open access to employment information on government employees but close personnel records.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina digg:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina spurl:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina wists:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina simpy:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina newsvine:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina blinklist:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina furl:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina reddit:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina fark:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina blogmarks:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina Y!:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina smarking:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina magnolia:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina segnalo:This week in public records: Tennessee - Colorado - North Carolina
April 25th, 2007

This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona

The North Carolina Sex Offender Registry has added email notification and mapping. Search by partial name, city, county, address or physical coordinates to retrieve a list of offenders. Select a profile, then click on the mapping symbol. Expand the view to include registrants within a 1, 3 or 5 mile radius. Hover over the icon to view the other nearby registrants’ photos and addresses. Then request email notification whenever a sex offender is registered at an address within that radius. The search function also covers sex offenders who are incarcerated.

Montana driving record histories and vehicle license information can now be obtained from the State of Montana Web site. Both are only available with with an account, subject to a permissible reason, outlined in the subscriber agreement.

…Personal Information may be requested as a part of Agreed Data only for the following purposes:
A. By any insurer or insurance support organization in connection with claims
investigation activities, anti-fraud activities, rating, or underwriting.
B. In the normal course of business by a legitimate business or its agents,
employees or contractors:
1. To verify the accuracy of personal information submitted by the individual
who is the subject of the record to the business or its agents, employees
or contractors; and
2. If such information is not correct, to obtain the correct information, but only for the purposes of preventing fraud by pursuing legal remedies against, or recovering on a debt or security interest against an insured or applicant.
3. To verify vehicle information.
C. By an employer or its agent or insurer to obtain or verify information relating to a holder of a commercial driver’s license required under the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 (49 U.S.C. Part 383)
D. For use in connection with any civil, criminal, administrative, or arbitral
proceeding in any Federal, State, or local court or agency or before any selfregulatory
body, including the service of process…

[Via TVC]

Booking photos of those who are arrested but not charged or found not guilty must be removed from Web sites maintained by county Sheriff offices, according to an opinion issued by the Alabama Attorney General.

Plot parcels and geographic features on the Tucson Arizona Department of Transportation GIS parcel viewer. Search by address, real property owner name, name of school or intersection. Mastering the map functions can take some time if you’re not versed in the Autodesk program (which requires the Internet Explorer browser), so you might want to consult their map viewer guide. The easiest way to plot a parcel is to search by the owner name, address or parcel number from this page. Then select the link, “zoom to parcel”, which highlights the parcel on the map. Select “detail information” to link directly to permit history for that parcel and recorded documents.

Print and save maps with the features you specify. The Tucson Department of Transportation also produces other maps related to traffic and geographic land characteristics.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona digg:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona spurl:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona wists:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona simpy:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona newsvine:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona blinklist:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona furl:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona reddit:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona fark:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona blogmarks:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona Y!:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona smarking:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona magnolia:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona segnalo:This week in public records: North Carolina - Montana - Alabama - Arizona
January 27th, 2007

Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets

News 14 Carolina recently aired a story about Karin Goin who uses regular dogs that she trains rigorously to find missing pets.

“(The dogs) are at least 85 percent of the investigation,” she said. “We are on the dumb end of the leash. We basically follow behind.”
Karin Goin

You can see the newsclip by clicking here.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets digg:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets spurl:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets wists:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets simpy:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets newsvine:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets blinklist:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets furl:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets reddit:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets fark:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets blogmarks:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets Y!:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets smarking:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets magnolia:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets segnalo:Detective Agency Finds Missing Pets
January 15th, 2007

This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina

The San Joaquin Recorder now has its index online.

The Spokane County, Washington Sheriff’s Office has added a roster of current inmates to its Website. Search by name to get inmate details.

The Wyoming connection to Vinelink is expanding and eventually will cover all counties, parole boards and the state Department of Corrections. Cheyenne is expected to be online within 6 months.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that federal prosecutors can withhold witness names.

Prosecutors gave defense attorneys parts of the reports, but withheld sections that could reveal the names of witnesses. They argued the reports were covered by a federal court rule protecting the work of “government agents” and that revealing the names could endanger witnesses who are project residents.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the report sections could be withheld because the police qualified as government agents, even though they weren’t federal employees.

A private law firm representing a town in North Carolina must still comply with the open records laws, according to a state appeals court.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina digg:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina spurl:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina wists:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina simpy:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina newsvine:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina blinklist:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina furl:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina reddit:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina fark:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina blogmarks:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina Y!:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina smarking:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina magnolia:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina segnalo:This week in public records - California - Wyoming - Washington - North Carolina