<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Private Investigator Blog - Public Records, Internet Search - PI Buzz &#187; Nebraska</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pibuzz.com/category/states/nebraska/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pibuzz.com</link>
	<description>Private Investigator Blog - Public Records, Internet Search - PI Buzz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:16:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Public Records, Not Public Records and Private Investigators</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2009/05/17/public-records-not-public-records-and-private-investigators/</link>
		<comments>http://pibuzz.com/2009/05/17/public-records-not-public-records-and-private-investigators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 05:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tamara Thompson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Investigator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Bernardino]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/?p=1406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Government agencies won&#8217;t put public records on the Internet but the former Santa Bernardino County Assessor found a technological runaround to making his emails a public record. A private investigator and the former supervisor of the Worthless Check Division in the St.Tammany (Louisiana) District Attorney’s Office were sentenced to three years’ probation for buying and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government agencies won&#8217;t put public records on the Internet but the former <a href="http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_blackberry17.47256e1.html"target="_blank">Santa Bernardino County Assessor found a technological runaround</a> to making his emails a public record.</p>
<p>A private investigator and the former supervisor of the Worthless Check Division in the St.Tammany (Louisiana) District Attorney’s Office were <a href="http://www.slidellsentry.com/articles/2009/05/17/news/doc4a0f6cab46dc9760034116.txt"target="_blank">sentenced to three years’ probation</a> for buying and selling criminal information from the National Crime Information Center database. The DA employee got the heavier sentence &#8212; she also lost her job.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.supremecourt.ne.gov/opinions/2009/may/may15/s08-339.pdf"target="_blank">Nebraska Supreme Court ruling</a>: Burial records from a state run cemetery are a public record. The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) claimed that the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) applied because the cemetery was for residents at a former  psychiatric hospital. But the court noted that HIPAA allows for the  disclosure of protected health information when required by state law, and that Nebraska’s public records laws trumped HIPAA because these are death records, which are open records. <a href="http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=10756"target="_blank"><em>Reported by RCFP</em>.</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://watchdogblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/05/more-information-on-the-dob-is.html"target="_blank">Texas media, private investigators and genealogists are opposing the efforts of the Texas legislature</a> to exempt the dates of birth of government employees from disclosure as a public record. The media has uncovered misdeeds by employees of the Texas Youth Commission &#8212; matching dates of birth with employee names &#8212; involving abuse of people and the public trust. Shielding dates of birth in public records does not protect the public from identity theft, as legislatures claim when attempting to carve out more public record exemptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pibuzz.com/2009/05/17/public-records-not-public-records-and-private-investigators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA criminal records closure proposal fails &#8211; Arkansas restricts court records &#8211; Nebraska court rules on Internet documents</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2007/08/12/aba-criminal-records-closure-proposal-fails-arkansas-restricts-court-records-nebraska-court-rules-on-internet-documents/</link>
		<comments>http://pibuzz.com/2007/08/12/aba-criminal-records-closure-proposal-fails-arkansas-restricts-court-records-nebraska-court-rules-on-internet-documents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tamara Thompson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/2007/08/12/aba-criminal-records-closure-proposal-fails-arkansas-restricts-court-records-nebraska-court-rules-on-internet-documents/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The trend by courts to restrict the availability of criminal records made a short swing past the American Bar Association which killed a proposal at its annual conference on Friday that would have recommend state and federal courts seal criminal records. Vigorous lobbying by media First Amendment advocates and business groups lead to the measuring [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trend by courts to restrict the availability of criminal records made a short  swing past the <strong><a href="http://meetings.abanet.org/webupload/commupload/CR209800/newsletterpubs/SealRescleanRC6507alfsasFINAL.pdf"target="_blank">American Bar Association</a></strong> which  <strong><a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1186840718761"target="_blank"> killed a proposal at its annual conference</a> </strong>on Friday that would have recommend state and federal courts seal criminal records. Vigorous lobbying by media First Amendment advocates and business groups lead to the measuring being withdrawn before it got to a vote. <em>Initial story reported by <a href="http://www.corruptionchronicles.com/2007/08/sealing_court_records_to_prote.html"target="_blank">Corruption Chronicles.</a></em>
</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://courts.state.ar.us/opinions/2007a/20070222/access.pdf?num=10"target="_blank">An Opinion issued by the Arkansas Supreme Court</a></strong> that revises permissible access to court records is now in effect. Information in case records that is now considered confidential includes litigant addresses and phone numbers, Social Security numbers and information about cases expunged or sealed. Bulk sale of criminal case information to the public or for commercial purposes is prohibited.</p>
<p>Cut-and-paste does not an admissible court document make when collecting data from an Internet Web site, according to a <strong>Nebraska</strong> District Court. <em><strong><a href="http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?s=latestnews&#038;id=1811"target="_blank">Read the analysis</a></strong> at Internet Business Law Services.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pibuzz.com/2007/08/12/aba-criminal-records-closure-proposal-fails-arkansas-restricts-court-records-nebraska-court-rules-on-internet-documents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This week in public records: California &#8211; Connecticut &#8211; North Carolina &#8211; Nebraska &#8211; New York &#8211; Minnesota</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2007/06/20/this-week-in-public-records-california-connecticut-north-carolina-nebraska-new-york-minnesota/</link>
		<comments>http://pibuzz.com/2007/06/20/this-week-in-public-records-california-connecticut-north-carolina-nebraska-new-york-minnesota/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tamara Thompson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vital Records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/2007/06/20/this-week-in-public-records-california-connecticut-north-carolina-nebraska-new-york-minnesota/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Los Angeles County Superior Court has ruled that church personnel files of priests accused of molesting children may be released to the public, whether or not there was a criminal prosecution. The decision affects a small number of clergy but tips the balance in favor of the public right to know over privacy, which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Los Angeles County Superior Court has ruled that <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-priest19jun19,1,6434071.story?coll=la-headlines-california"target="_blank">church personnel files of priests accused of molesting children may be released to the public, whether or not there was a criminal prosecution</a>. The decision affects a small number of clergy but tips the balance in favor of the public right to know over privacy, which could affect many other cases.</p>
<p>Santa Clara County, California is <strong><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/valley/ci_6137335"target="_blank">continuing to fight a Superior Court determination</a></strong> that its GIS mapping should be easily available to the public at low cost. Meanwhile, Greenwich, Connecticut has assented to that state&#8217;s Supreme Court ruling and will <strong><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/2007/06/16/ending_long_battle_greenwich_to_post_aerial_photos_on_web/"target="_blank">post aerial photographs of the town</a></strong> on its Web site. Both government agencies used the specious defense that freely available geographic information systems maps were a security risk.
</p>
<p>Folks in <strong>North Carolina</strong> may want to comment at <strong><a href="http://jlthigpen.blogspot.com/"target="_blank">the blog of a county Register who removed vital records</a></strong> from the Internet, then wrote about it.
</p>
<p>The state police can demand lists of <strong><a href="http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/06/13/news/nebraska/da0af3dd4c618541862572f9000a1c62.txt"target="_blank">email activity conducted by a business</a></strong> if they deem it relevant to an investigation, according to an opinion by the <strong><a href="http://www.ago.state.ne.us/"target="_blank">Nebraska Attorney General</a></strong>. This includes &#8220;non content&#8221; records retained by providers of electronic communication services, such as ISP records of email headers, but not the email message.
</p>
<p><strong><a href="https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivilLocal/LCMain"target="_blank">Search the New York local civil court</a></strong> records by index number, party name, attorney/firm or judge. <a href="http://www.courts.state.ny.us/press/adv2007_01.shtml"target="_blank">Some courts are online now</a> and others will be added through the year.</p>
<p>Appeals filed with the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Supreme Court and the Minnesota Court of Appeals are now <strong><a href="http://www.courts.state.mn.us/?page=NewsItemDisplay&#038;item=20452"target="_blank">searchable online</a></strong>. More extensive information is available for cases filed after March 2003.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pibuzz.com/2007/06/20/this-week-in-public-records-california-connecticut-north-carolina-nebraska-new-york-minnesota/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verify a teacher certification or credential</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2007/05/04/verify-a-teacher-certification-or-credential/</link>
		<comments>http://pibuzz.com/2007/05/04/verify-a-teacher-certification-or-credential/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 18:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tamara Thompson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/2007/05/04/verify-a-teacher-certification-or-credential/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Education Web sites for Alaska, Indiana, Louisiana, Nebraska, New York, Tennessee and]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Education Web sites for <a href="http://www.eed.state.ak.us/TeacherCertification/CertSearchForm.cfm"target="_blank">Alaska</a>, <a href="http://mustang.doe.state.in.us/TEACH/teach_inq.cfm"target="_blank">Indiana</a>, <a href="https://www.teachlouisiana.net/Certification/searchcertificationp.asp"target="_blank">Louisiana</a>, <a href="http://datacenter.nde.state.ne.us/nclb_lookup/nclb_lookup.dll"target="_blank">Nebraska</a>, <a href="http://eservices.nysed.gov/teach/certhelp/CpPersonSearchExternal.jsp?trgAction=INQUIRY"target="_blank">New York</a>, <a href="http://www.k-12.state.tn.us/tcertinf/Search.asp"target="_blank">Tennessee </a>and <a href="http://www.wv.gov/offsite.aspx?u=http://wvde.state.wv.us/certification/status/"target=_blank">West Virginia</a>    are a few that have a searchable database of certified public school teachers. These databases can mostly be searched by partial name, a convenient tool to obtain a teacher&#8217;s full name, verify her certification or how long she&#8217;s been teaching. States that don&#8217;t have educator certifications online &#8211; such as Mississippi &#8211; but whose teachers  are <a href="http://www.nbpts.org/resources/nbct_directory"target="_blank">nationally certified</a> are in the database of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Search by state, city, district or name.</p>
<p>If you want to identify states that have online teacher certification records go to the <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/ccseas.asp"target="_blank">specific state</a> Department of Education Web site. Not everything can be found in a search engine! As an additional measure, you can formulate a Google query. One way you might look for the Massachusetts teacher licensing:</p>
<p>Massachusetts &#8220;teacher certification &#8221; &#8220;department of education&#8221; -site:.com</p>
<p>Some states may refer to this as an &#8220;educator certification&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="https://scteachers.ed.sc.gov/apps/mycert/logon.cfm"target="_blank">South Carolina</a> requires the last 5 digits of the teacher&#8217;s Social Security number to verify a credential &#8211; making the site unusable for the general public. <a href="https://teachercred.ctc.ca.gov/teachers/PublicSearchProxy"target="_blank">California teacher lookup</a> is at the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing site, which won&#8217;t come up if you&#8217;re using the phrase &#8220;teacher certification&#8221;. </p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.dir.ca.gov/databases/dlselr/studtch.html"target="_blank">California Department of Labor Standards Enforcement</a> has 5 different personal information databases, including a <a href="http://www.dir.ca.gov/databases/dlselr/studtch.html"target="_blank">studio teachers</a> certification database. Search other <a href="http://www.dol.gov/esa/contacts/state_of.htm"target="_blank">State Labor Department Web sites.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://pibuzz.com/2006/08/29/government-resources-education/"target="_blank">I previously wrote</a> about some school finder resources and other state educator certification lookups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pibuzz.com/2007/05/04/verify-a-teacher-certification-or-credential/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

