<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This week in public records: Pennsylvania &#8211; Massachusetts &#8211; Arkansas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pibuzz.com/2007/07/24/this-week-in-public-records-pennsylvania-massachusetts-arkansas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pibuzz.com/2007/07/24/this-week-in-public-records-pennsylvania-massachusetts-arkansas/</link>
	<description>Private Investigator Blog - Public Records, Internet Search - PI Buzz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota - Private Investigator &#124; Public Records &#124; Internet Search &#124; Privacy &#124; Reporting &#124; Personal Information &#124; Adoption &#124; Genealogy &#124;- PI Buzz</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2007/07/24/this-week-in-public-records-pennsylvania-massachusetts-arkansas/comment-page-1/#comment-271669</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; This week in public records: Pennsylvania - New Jersey - North Dakota - Private Investigator &#124; Public Records &#124; Internet Search &#124; Privacy &#124; Reporting &#124; Personal Information &#124; Adoption &#124; Genealogy &#124;- PI Buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/2007/07/24/this-week-in-public-records-pennsylvania-massachusetts-arkansas/#comment-271669</guid>
		<description>[...] Last year, I wrote about a similar determination by the Idaho Supreme Court and the Arkansas Supreme Court. The courts, not the government entity, must determine whether public employees&#8217; emails are private, according to the Arizona Supreme Court. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last year, I wrote about a similar determination by the Idaho Supreme Court and the Arkansas Supreme Court. The courts, not the government entity, must determine whether public employees&#8217; emails are private, according to the Arizona Supreme Court. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - Supreme Court - This week in public records: Pennsylvania - Massachusetts - Arkansas</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2007/07/24/this-week-in-public-records-pennsylvania-massachusetts-arkansas/comment-page-1/#comment-158033</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update - Supreme Court - This week in public records: Pennsylvania - Massachusetts - Arkansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/2007/07/24/this-week-in-public-records-pennsylvania-massachusetts-arkansas/#comment-158033</guid>
		<description>[...] White House                       Link to Article                supreme court This week in public records: Pennsylvania - Massachusetts - Arkansas &#187;  Posted at PI Buzz - Private Investigator &#124; Public Records &#124; Internet Search &#124; Privacy &#124; Reporting &#124; Personal Information &#124; Adoption &#124; Genealogy &#124; on Tuesday, July 24, 2007   A law firm that accessed and viewed archived Web pages of an adversary through Archive ... Journal, July 24, 2007 The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that documents covered ... by a court, in a ruling of the Supreme Court of Arkansas. The determination may rest in whether the non  View Entire Article &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] White House                       Link to Article                supreme court This week in public records: Pennsylvania &#8211; Massachusetts &#8211; Arkansas &#187;  Posted at PI Buzz &#8211; Private Investigator | Public Records | Internet Search | Privacy | Reporting | Personal Information | Adoption | Genealogy | on Tuesday, July 24, 2007   A law firm that accessed and viewed archived Web pages of an adversary through Archive &#8230; Journal, July 24, 2007 The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that documents covered &#8230; by a court, in a ruling of the Supreme Court of Arkansas. The determination may rest in whether the non  View Entire Article &#187; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

