<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the judgments and liens databases will become obsolete</title>
	<link>http://pibuzz.com/2007/02/03/why-the-judgments-and-liens-databases-will-become-obsolete/</link>
	<description>Private Investigator | Public Records | Internet Search | Privacy | Reporting | Personal Information | Adoption | Genealogy |</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: xcbn</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2007/02/03/why-the-judgments-and-liens-databases-will-become-obsolete/#comment-326142</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pibuzz.com/2007/02/03/why-the-judgments-and-liens-databases-will-become-obsolete/#comment-326142</guid>
					<description>By reading we enrich the mind; by conversation we polish it.  http://www.laizjj.cn/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By reading we enrich the mind; by conversation we polish it.  <a href='http://www.laizjj.cn/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.laizjj.cn/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tax Liens</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2007/02/03/why-the-judgments-and-liens-databases-will-become-obsolete/#comment-309831</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pibuzz.com/2007/02/03/why-the-judgments-and-liens-databases-will-become-obsolete/#comment-309831</guid>
					<description>yes i agree that personal details are subject to being altered so that it will become impossible to verify whether a federal, state or municipal tax lien belongs to a particular individual or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes i agree that personal details are subject to being altered so that it will become impossible to verify whether a federal, state or municipal tax lien belongs to a particular individual or not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PI Buzz - Private Investigator &#124; Public Records &#124; Internet Search &#124; Privacy &#124; Reporting &#124; Personal Information &#124; Adoption &#124; Genealogy &#124; &#187; Personal information: business background and more legislation</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2007/02/03/why-the-judgments-and-liens-databases-will-become-obsolete/#comment-101614</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pibuzz.com/2007/02/03/why-the-judgments-and-liens-databases-will-become-obsolete/#comment-101614</guid>
					<description>[...] Personal information: business background and more legislation     By Tamara Thompson Private investigators may discover new research sources and approaches reading, Gathering Competitive Intelligence for Litigators and Business Lawyers (April 2007, Wisconsin Lawyer), Tony Chan&amp;#8217;s roundup of online personal information databases and Web sites for the legal field. Much of the article is directed to attorneys, and those in Wisconsin, related to legal business development or fee-based data sources. But he also mentions a few of the free public records through which you can find people in the military, verify a professional license or disciplinary actions, and develop competitive intelligence. The article also footnotes a posting I did on the trends in restricting access to public records. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Personal information: business background and more legislation     By Tamara Thompson Private investigators may discover new research sources and approaches reading, Gathering Competitive Intelligence for Litigators and Business Lawyers (April 2007, Wisconsin Lawyer), Tony Chan&#8217;s roundup of online personal information databases and Web sites for the legal field. Much of the article is directed to attorneys, and those in Wisconsin, related to legal business development or fee-based data sources. But he also mentions a few of the free public records through which you can find people in the military, verify a professional license or disciplinary actions, and develop competitive intelligence. The article also footnotes a posting I did on the trends in restricting access to public records. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PI Buzz - Private Investigator &#124; Public Records &#124; Internet Search &#124; Privacy &#124; Reporting &#124; Personal Information &#124; Adoption &#124; Genealogy &#124; &#187; California State Controller orders removal of social security numbers</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2007/02/03/why-the-judgments-and-liens-databases-will-become-obsolete/#comment-78646</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pibuzz.com/2007/02/03/why-the-judgments-and-liens-databases-will-become-obsolete/#comment-78646</guid>
					<description>[...] I alerted readers to this general trend a few weeks ago in, Why the judgments and liens databases will become obsolete. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I alerted readers to this general trend a few weeks ago in, Why the judgments and liens databases will become obsolete. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: R. E. Conary</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2007/02/03/why-the-judgments-and-liens-databases-will-become-obsolete/#comment-60215</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 15:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pibuzz.com/2007/02/03/why-the-judgments-and-liens-databases-will-become-obsolete/#comment-60215</guid>
					<description>My original SSN card states boldly that the SSN is &quot;for Social Security and Tax purposes -- NOT for identification&quot; (although I understand that newer cards don't say that). So, frankly, I've always resented anyone wanting my number for any other purpose. All of the demand for using the SSN came about by fiat for convenience. Too bad. Not having it to cross reference someone may be inconvenient, but that's life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My original SSN card states boldly that the SSN is &#8220;for Social Security and Tax purposes &#8212; NOT for identification&#8221; (although I understand that newer cards don&#8217;t say that). So, frankly, I&#8217;ve always resented anyone wanting my number for any other purpose. All of the demand for using the SSN came about by fiat for convenience. Too bad. Not having it to cross reference someone may be inconvenient, but that&#8217;s life.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
