<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Hampshire Court Rules Against Private Investigator in Stalking Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pibuzz.com/2006/12/04/new-hampshire-court-rules-against-private-investigator-in-stalking-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/12/04/new-hampshire-court-rules-against-private-investigator-in-stalking-case/</link>
	<description>Private Investigator Blog - Public Records, Internet Search - PI Buzz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:35:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David McGrath</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/12/04/new-hampshire-court-rules-against-private-investigator-in-stalking-case/comment-page-1/#comment-280404</link>
		<dc:creator>David McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/2006/12/04/new-hampshire-court-rules-against-private-investigator-in-stalking-case/#comment-280404</guid>
		<description>I also agree, investigators who display a positive attitude, don&#039;t find themselves in this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree, investigators who display a positive attitude, don&#8217;t find themselves in this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Massimillo Long Island Investigations</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/12/04/new-hampshire-court-rules-against-private-investigator-in-stalking-case/comment-page-1/#comment-110017</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Massimillo Long Island Investigations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 19:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/2006/12/04/new-hampshire-court-rules-against-private-investigator-in-stalking-case/#comment-110017</guid>
		<description>I agree. And why be uncooperative? That will get you no where. There was obviously something hidden here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. And why be uncooperative? That will get you no where. There was obviously something hidden here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe McMahon</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/12/04/new-hampshire-court-rules-against-private-investigator-in-stalking-case/comment-page-1/#comment-109765</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe McMahon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 05:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/2006/12/04/new-hampshire-court-rules-against-private-investigator-in-stalking-case/#comment-109765</guid>
		<description>Well, even if it was &quot;for a friend&quot;....the investigator should have documented everything as usual. I have done work &quot;for friends&quot; before and still document everything as if it were an actual paying client. Even though it is for a friend, it is still an official investigation and I could be held accountable for just this sort of situation. So, that&#039;s his fault and he should have been a little more cooperative with the courts....if it was a legit case...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, even if it was &#8220;for a friend&#8221;&#8230;.the investigator should have documented everything as usual. I have done work &#8220;for friends&#8221; before and still document everything as if it were an actual paying client. Even though it is for a friend, it is still an official investigation and I could be held accountable for just this sort of situation. So, that&#8217;s his fault and he should have been a little more cooperative with the courts&#8230;.if it was a legit case&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Healy</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/12/04/new-hampshire-court-rules-against-private-investigator-in-stalking-case/comment-page-1/#comment-68146</link>
		<dc:creator>John Healy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/2006/12/04/new-hampshire-court-rules-against-private-investigator-in-stalking-case/#comment-68146</guid>
		<description>This was a private surveillance, done for a friend. There was no attorney involved.

NH law does cover PIs on a surveilance. The term legitinmate purpose is in the stalking statue as an exemption for investigators. The burden is on us to prove the purpose was legitimate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a private surveillance, done for a friend. There was no attorney involved.</p>
<p>NH law does cover PIs on a surveilance. The term legitinmate purpose is in the stalking statue as an exemption for investigators. The burden is on us to prove the purpose was legitimate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/12/04/new-hampshire-court-rules-against-private-investigator-in-stalking-case/comment-page-1/#comment-22106</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/2006/12/04/new-hampshire-court-rules-against-private-investigator-in-stalking-case/#comment-22106</guid>
		<description>Didn’t the court just subpoena his case record?  (If there really was one.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn’t the court just subpoena his case record?  (If there really was one.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

