<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secret trial courts &#8211; private judges &#8211; hidden public records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pibuzz.com/2006/05/09/secret-trial-courts-private-judges-hidden-public-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/05/09/secret-trial-courts-private-judges-hidden-public-records/</link>
	<description>Private Investigator Blog - Public Records, Internet Search - PI Buzz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:35:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PI Buzz - Private Investigator &#124; Public Records &#124; Internet Search &#124; Privacy &#124; Reporting &#124; Personal Information &#124; Adoption &#124; Genealogy &#124; &#187; This week in public records - Texas - Florida - FTC</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/05/09/secret-trial-courts-private-judges-hidden-public-records/comment-page-1/#comment-15969</link>
		<dc:creator>PI Buzz - Private Investigator &#124; Public Records &#124; Internet Search &#124; Privacy &#124; Reporting &#124; Personal Information &#124; Adoption &#124; Genealogy &#124; &#187; This week in public records - Texas - Florida - FTC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/?p=709#comment-15969</guid>
		<description>[...] More details are emerging on the theme of secret court dockets, which have been reported on in various jurisdictions in the past year. A recent Miami Herald article reveals that false court records have been created to disguise the identity of government informants, in violation of state law. Miami-Dade prosecutors argue that court rules that exempt some sensitive records from public disclosure also authorize judges to misrepresent the public record to protect informants. But no rule explicitly gives judges power to order the creation of a false court record. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More details are emerging on the theme of secret court dockets, which have been reported on in various jurisdictions in the past year. A recent Miami Herald article reveals that false court records have been created to disguise the identity of government informants, in violation of state law. Miami-Dade prosecutors argue that court rules that exempt some sensitive records from public disclosure also authorize judges to misrepresent the public record to protect informants. But no rule explicitly gives judges power to order the creation of a false court record. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PI Buzz - Private Investigator &#124; Public Records &#124; Internet Search &#124; Privacy &#124; Reporting &#124; Personal Information &#124; Adoption &#124; Genealogy &#124; &#187; This week in public records - Maryland - Wisconsin - Florida</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/05/09/secret-trial-courts-private-judges-hidden-public-records/comment-page-1/#comment-5004</link>
		<dc:creator>PI Buzz - Private Investigator &#124; Public Records &#124; Internet Search &#124; Privacy &#124; Reporting &#124; Personal Information &#124; Adoption &#124; Genealogy &#124; &#187; This week in public records - Maryland - Wisconsin - Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 05:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/?p=709#comment-5004</guid>
		<description>[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.           Leave aReply [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.           Leave aReply [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PI Buzz - Private Investigator &#124; Public Records &#124; Internet Search &#124; Privacy &#124; Reporting &#124; Personal Information &#124; Adoption &#124; Genealogy &#124; &#187; This week in public records - Texas - Arizona</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/05/09/secret-trial-courts-private-judges-hidden-public-records/comment-page-1/#comment-1857</link>
		<dc:creator>PI Buzz - Private Investigator &#124; Public Records &#124; Internet Search &#124; Privacy &#124; Reporting &#124; Personal Information &#124; Adoption &#124; Genealogy &#124; &#187; This week in public records - Texas - Arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 21:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/?p=709#comment-1857</guid>
		<description>[...] By now you&#8217;re probably aware that there&#8217;s no such animal as a thorough court records check, even in an individual county. Why? Because there are hidden dockets that are not accessible to the public and are not recorded in the court index of cases. Also, some records are deemed confidential, not just juvenile matters but divorce and other civil cases. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] By now you&#8217;re probably aware that there&#8217;s no such animal as a thorough court records check, even in an individual county. Why? Because there are hidden dockets that are not accessible to the public and are not recorded in the court index of cases. Also, some records are deemed confidential, not just juvenile matters but divorce and other civil cases. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esquire Litigation Associates</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/05/09/secret-trial-courts-private-judges-hidden-public-records/comment-page-1/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Esquire Litigation Associates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 03:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/?p=709#comment-812</guid>
		<description>mr. buckley, please turn off your cap lock and &quot;stop yelling&quot;.  btw, i haven&#039;t a clue what you were trying to say, but would like to get one.  if you don&#039;t mind, wtf does this mean; &quot;OFTEN THE MAJORITY TO IGNORANT TO BE SAVY TO. THIS PHENOMINIA IS NOT NEW, BOTH IN APPLICATION OR USAGE.&quot;  further, this; &quot;OFTEN ENGAGED IN THIS SHADOW GOVERNMENT, RESULTING IN THE CONTROL BY THE POWERS THAT BE, OF THE LOCAL TERRITORY, POLITICALLY, THEOLOGICALLY, ECONOMICALLY, CULTURALLY, ECT… THIS SUBJECT ALSO DEPICTED IN CINEMA YEARS PAST, ADDRESSING ASPECTS OF THE SAME SUBJECT&quot; means what?  

if i may paraphrase, are you asserting that both civil and criminal rulings that occur in a private unmonitored, unchecked setting undermine the foundation of the justice system and lead to potential abuses?  if so, i think your concerns are unwarranted :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mr. buckley, please turn off your cap lock and &#8220;stop yelling&#8221;.  btw, i haven&#8217;t a clue what you were trying to say, but would like to get one.  if you don&#8217;t mind, wtf does this mean; &#8220;OFTEN THE MAJORITY TO IGNORANT TO BE SAVY TO. THIS PHENOMINIA IS NOT NEW, BOTH IN APPLICATION OR USAGE.&#8221;  further, this; &#8220;OFTEN ENGAGED IN THIS SHADOW GOVERNMENT, RESULTING IN THE CONTROL BY THE POWERS THAT BE, OF THE LOCAL TERRITORY, POLITICALLY, THEOLOGICALLY, ECONOMICALLY, CULTURALLY, ECT… THIS SUBJECT ALSO DEPICTED IN CINEMA YEARS PAST, ADDRESSING ASPECTS OF THE SAME SUBJECT&#8221; means what?  </p>
<p>if i may paraphrase, are you asserting that both civil and criminal rulings that occur in a private unmonitored, unchecked setting undermine the foundation of the justice system and lead to potential abuses?  if so, i think your concerns are unwarranted <img src='http://pibuzz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EUGENE BUCKLEY</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/05/09/secret-trial-courts-private-judges-hidden-public-records/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>EUGENE BUCKLEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 21:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/?p=709#comment-212</guid>
		<description>POST SCRIPT; WHEN DEPLOYED IN CONJUCTION TO CRIMINAL INTERPRIZES, IT OFTEN RESULTS IN CYNDICATES, AND UNDER CURRENT LAW, IS REFERED TO AS RACKITEERING.  OF COURSE, I AM NOT A LAWYER.  REGUARDS, E. A. BUCKLEY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>POST SCRIPT; WHEN DEPLOYED IN CONJUCTION TO CRIMINAL INTERPRIZES, IT OFTEN RESULTS IN CYNDICATES, AND UNDER CURRENT LAW, IS REFERED TO AS RACKITEERING.  OF COURSE, I AM NOT A LAWYER.  REGUARDS, E. A. BUCKLEY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EUGENE BUCKLEY</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/05/09/secret-trial-courts-private-judges-hidden-public-records/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>EUGENE BUCKLEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 21:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pibuzz.com/?p=709#comment-211</guid>
		<description>DEAR PI BUZZ, I HOPE THIS EMAIL FINDS YOU WELL. 
I APPRECIATE YOUR ADDRESSING THIS VERY IMPORTANT ISSUE, &quot;SECRET TRIAL COURTS, PRIVATE JUDGES,AND HIDDEN PUBLIC RECORDS&quot;.   THAT EFFECTS ALL, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY.  OFTEN THE MAJORITY TO IGNORANT TO BE SAVY TO.  THIS PHENOMINIA IS NOT NEW, BOTH IN APPLICATION OR USAGE.  &quot;STAR CHAMBERS&quot; IS AN EXCELLENT EXAMPLAR.  ORIGINATING FROM ENGLAND CENTURIES PAST? OFTEN ENGAGED IN THIS SHADOW GOVERNMENT, RESULTING IN THE CONTROL BY THE POWERS THAT BE, OF THE LOCAL TERRITORY, POLITICALLY, THEOLOGICALLY, ECONOMICALLY, CULTURALLY, ECT... THIS SUBJECT ALSO DEPICTED IN CINEMA YEARS PAST, ADDRESSING ASPECTS OF THE SAME SUBJECT.  SO, BE IT PUBLIC, AS IN MCCARTHISM, OR PRIVATE, BLACK LISTINGS. THE RESULT IS OFTEN THE SAME.  THE UNDERMINING OF BOTH THE CONSTITUTION AND THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC, BY A INDIVIDUALS CLOAKED IN THE STATUS OF &quot;LEGITAMACY&quot; OF WHILE APPOINTED TO &quot;PUBLIC&quot; INSTITUTIONS .  THUS IS JUST ONE MAN&#039;S OPINION.  SINCERELY, E. A. BUCKLEY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DEAR PI BUZZ, I HOPE THIS EMAIL FINDS YOU WELL.<br />
I APPRECIATE YOUR ADDRESSING THIS VERY IMPORTANT ISSUE, &#8220;SECRET TRIAL COURTS, PRIVATE JUDGES,AND HIDDEN PUBLIC RECORDS&#8221;.   THAT EFFECTS ALL, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY.  OFTEN THE MAJORITY TO IGNORANT TO BE SAVY TO.  THIS PHENOMINIA IS NOT NEW, BOTH IN APPLICATION OR USAGE.  &#8220;STAR CHAMBERS&#8221; IS AN EXCELLENT EXAMPLAR.  ORIGINATING FROM ENGLAND CENTURIES PAST? OFTEN ENGAGED IN THIS SHADOW GOVERNMENT, RESULTING IN THE CONTROL BY THE POWERS THAT BE, OF THE LOCAL TERRITORY, POLITICALLY, THEOLOGICALLY, ECONOMICALLY, CULTURALLY, ECT&#8230; THIS SUBJECT ALSO DEPICTED IN CINEMA YEARS PAST, ADDRESSING ASPECTS OF THE SAME SUBJECT.  SO, BE IT PUBLIC, AS IN MCCARTHISM, OR PRIVATE, BLACK LISTINGS. THE RESULT IS OFTEN THE SAME.  THE UNDERMINING OF BOTH THE CONSTITUTION AND THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC, BY A INDIVIDUALS CLOAKED IN THE STATUS OF &#8220;LEGITAMACY&#8221; OF WHILE APPOINTED TO &#8220;PUBLIC&#8221; INSTITUTIONS .  THUS IS JUST ONE MAN&#8217;S OPINION.  SINCERELY, E. A. BUCKLEY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

