Colorado legislature aims to close divorce and marriage records
The Colorado legislature is on the verge of sealing files in divorce records and marriage applications from the public. There are no exceptions for genealogists or other legal uses of these documents in the marriage applications bill. Financial records in divorce files may be available to debt collectors. Is this privacy fever run amuck? Surely, absolute closure isn’t the course the privacy advocates are seeking.
3 Responses to “Colorado legislature aims to close divorce and marriage records”
Leave a Reply
Editors
Editors
Recent Posts
- Private Investigator Research Links – Jan 2012
- Sacramento Sheriff Inmate Release Notification
- Genealogy Research and Family History Resources in the San Francisco Bay Area
- Private Investigator Research Links – Dec 2011
- Private Investigator buzz in 2011 – search strategies, public records, database pitfalls
- Social Security Death Index is now restricted
- Private Investigator Research Links – Nov 2011
- Wildcard your county public record searches
- Private Investigator Research Links – Oct 2011
- Private Investigator Research Links – Sept 2011
Recent Comments
- Mike Walker: Hi Tamara, Very considerate of you...
- Takia Woods: I am looking for my father by the...
- americo mercado: lets hope the Sheriffs Office...
- Neil SANKEY: Tamara you are an absolute Gem....
- jodie airey: i am trying to find a friend major...
- Tamara Thompson: All Indiana court case index...
- Patricia Waskom: Web site will not come up. I...
- MISES GONAZLEZ: HELLO IM MOSES GONZALEZ I USED...
- Tamara Thompson: Elementary schools produce...
- Connor: I’m looking for my Kindergaten...
Categories
- Alabama (7)
- Alaska (3)
- Arizona (20)
- Arkansas (7)
- Blogs (3)
- Business (30)
- California (113)
- Canada (5)
- Cell (6)
- Colorado (13)
- Computer tools (5)
- Conferences (2)
- Connecticut (17)
- Criminal (111)
- D.C. (3)
- Data Brokers (18)
- Databases (76)
- Delaware (6)
- Divorce (2)
- Education (5)
- Florida (32)
- FOIA (8)
- Genealogy (16)
- Georgia (6)
- Government (79)
- Hawaii (3)
- Idaho (6)
- Illinois (18)
- Indiana (8)
- Insurance (2)
- International (22)
- Iowa (14)
- Kansas (6)
- Kentucky (6)
- Legal (3)
- Legislation (54)
- Litigation (23)
- Louisiana (6)
- Maine (6)
- Maryland (11)
- Massachusetts (12)
- Media (3)
- Mexico (1)
- Michigan (9)
- Military (3)
- Minnesota (7)
- Mississippi (4)
- Missouri (16)
- Montana (6)
- Nebraska (4)
- Nevada (11)
- New Hampshire (11)
- New Jersey (16)
- New Mexico (8)
- New York (24)
- North Carolina (9)
- North Dakota (7)
- Ohio (17)
- Oklahoma (7)
- Oregon (13)
- Pennsylvania (25)
- Personal Data (52)
- PI Business (15)
- PIs In the News (52)
- Portals & Directories (5)
- Privacy (22)
- Private Investigator (26)
- Probate (4)
- Professional Licenses (7)
- Public Records (345)
- Puerto Rico (1)
- Real Property (26)
- Recorder (15)
- Reference (24)
- Regulation (22)
- Research Methods (30)
- Rhode Island (3)
- Search Engines (3)
- Social Networks (5)
- South Carolina (6)
- South Dakota (8)
- Spy Gear (4)
- States (277)
- Surveillance (5)
- Telco (40)
- Tennessee (10)
- Texas (18)
- Uncategorized (566)
- Utah (7)
- Vermont (6)
- Virginia (10)
- Vital Records (16)
- Washington (16)
- Web tools (39)
- West Virginia (3)
- Wisconsin (15)
- Workers Comp (3)
- Wyoming (2)






“This is not necessary. People who want to use information for bad purposes will always find a way to do it.” — at least not in an easy way.
[...] Colorado data brokers –more than one bad rap By Tamara Thompson A Colorado newspaper has revisited a couple of sore subjects for private investigators: the closure of that states’ public records, which I detailed last month; the information broker whose high profile antics set in motion the Gramm-Leach-Bliley legislation. [...]
This is not necessary. People who want to use information for bad purposes will always find a way to do it.