Colorado legislature aims to close divorce and marriage records
The Colorado legislature is on the verge of sealing files in divorce records and marriage applications from the public. There are no exceptions for genealogists or other legal uses of these documents in the marriage applications bill. Financial records in divorce files may be available to debt collectors. Is this privacy fever run amuck? Surely, absolute closure isn’t the course the privacy advocates are seeking.
3 Responses to “Colorado legislature aims to close divorce and marriage records”
Leave a Reply
Editors
Editors
Recent Posts
- Private Investigator Research Links – April 2012
- Free sources to verify a death
- Private Investigator Research Links – Mar 2012
- San Luis Obispo Court restricts public records access
- Facebook Interest Lists for Private Investigators
- Private Investigator Research Links – Feb 2012
- Private Investigator Research Links – Jan 2012
- Sacramento Sheriff Inmate Release Notification
- Genealogy Research and Family History Resources in the San Francisco Bay Area
- Private Investigator Research Links – Dec 2011
Recent Comments
- Elizabeth Krohn: Thank you for your list…...
- Francis Castillo: Nice list of research you got...
- americo mercado: good info many thanks
- Doris Gordon: Why should you have to pay for...
- Jane: Oh for crying out loud…yet another...
- PAULA DRAYTON: I AM SEARCHING FOR MY DAD US...
- Loger: Socialsecuritynumbers (dot) org sounds...
- international investigator: Interesting action...
- Linda Walshin: Tamara, The information you...
- Debbie Joseph: I was looking for a job as and...
Categories
- Alabama (7)
- Alaska (3)
- Arizona (20)
- Arkansas (7)
- Blogs (3)
- Business (30)
- California (115)
- Canada (5)
- Cell (6)
- Colorado (13)
- Computer tools (5)
- Conferences (2)
- Connecticut (17)
- Criminal (112)
- D.C. (3)
- Data Brokers (18)
- Databases (76)
- Delaware (6)
- Divorce (2)
- Education (5)
- Florida (32)
- FOIA (8)
- Genealogy (19)
- Georgia (6)
- Government (79)
- Hawaii (3)
- Idaho (6)
- Illinois (18)
- Indiana (8)
- Insurance (2)
- International (22)
- Iowa (14)
- Kansas (6)
- Kentucky (6)
- Legal (3)
- Legislation (55)
- Litigation (23)
- Louisiana (6)
- Maine (6)
- Maryland (11)
- Massachusetts (12)
- Media (3)
- Mexico (1)
- Michigan (9)
- Military (4)
- Minnesota (7)
- Mississippi (4)
- Missouri (16)
- Montana (7)
- Nebraska (4)
- Nevada (11)
- New Hampshire (11)
- New Jersey (16)
- New Mexico (8)
- New York (24)
- North Carolina (9)
- North Dakota (7)
- Ohio (17)
- Oklahoma (7)
- Oregon (13)
- Pennsylvania (25)
- Personal Data (52)
- PI Business (15)
- PIs In the News (52)
- Portals & Directories (6)
- Privacy (22)
- Private Investigator (26)
- Probate (4)
- Professional Licenses (7)
- Public Records (348)
- Puerto Rico (1)
- Real Property (26)
- Recorder (15)
- Reference (25)
- Regulation (22)
- Research Methods (30)
- Rhode Island (3)
- Search Engines (4)
- Social Networks (6)
- South Carolina (6)
- South Dakota (8)
- Spy Gear (4)
- States (277)
- Surveillance (5)
- Telco (40)
- Tennessee (10)
- Texas (18)
- Uncategorized (566)
- Utah (7)
- Vermont (6)
- Virginia (10)
- Vital Records (20)
- Washington (16)
- Web tools (41)
- West Virginia (3)
- Wisconsin (15)
- Workers Comp (3)
- Wyoming (2)






“This is not necessary. People who want to use information for bad purposes will always find a way to do it.” — at least not in an easy way.
[...] Colorado data brokers –more than one bad rap By Tamara Thompson A Colorado newspaper has revisited a couple of sore subjects for private investigators: the closure of that states’ public records, which I detailed last month; the information broker whose high profile antics set in motion the Gramm-Leach-Bliley legislation. [...]
This is not necessary. People who want to use information for bad purposes will always find a way to do it.