<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data</title>
	<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/02/25/california-and-texas-follow-the-lead-of-other-states-criminalizing-sales-of-telephone-subscriber-data/</link>
	<description>Private Investigator | Public Records | Internet Search | Privacy | Reporting | Personal Information | Adoption | Genealogy |</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: esquire litigation associates</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/02/25/california-and-texas-follow-the-lead-of-other-states-criminalizing-sales-of-telephone-subscriber-data/#comment-645</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pibuzz.com/2006/02/25/california-and-texas-follow-the-lead-of-other-states-criminalizing-sales-of-telephone-subscriber-data/#comment-645</guid>
					<description>obviously this information should not be available to the general public.  it should, however, be available to licensed investigators who can demonstrate their need for the information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obviously this information should not be available to the general public.  it should, however, be available to licensed investigators who can demonstrate their need for the information.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed Hodges</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/02/25/california-and-texas-follow-the-lead-of-other-states-criminalizing-sales-of-telephone-subscriber-data/#comment-32</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pibuzz.com/2006/02/25/california-and-texas-follow-the-lead-of-other-states-criminalizing-sales-of-telephone-subscriber-data/#comment-32</guid>
					<description>The NCIS is taking the lead in defending the Private Investigators rights to such records when needed to locate felons, and other targets who are in violation of the laws.  They have a position statement that we as private investigators should support and defend our rights to data in those cases where crimes or other offenses have taken place as well as in divorce situations.  Telephone records do NOT solve cases the add information to assist the investigator in determining what his next act will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NCIS is taking the lead in defending the Private Investigators rights to such records when needed to locate felons, and other targets who are in violation of the laws.  They have a position statement that we as private investigators should support and defend our rights to data in those cases where crimes or other offenses have taken place as well as in divorce situations.  Telephone records do NOT solve cases the add information to assist the investigator in determining what his next act will be.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tamara Thompson</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/02/25/california-and-texas-follow-the-lead-of-other-states-criminalizing-sales-of-telephone-subscriber-data/#comment-31</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 21:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pibuzz.com/2006/02/25/california-and-texas-follow-the-lead-of-other-states-criminalizing-sales-of-telephone-subscriber-data/#comment-31</guid>
					<description>Reselling of customer telephone information on the public Internet should be stopped. I'd refer you back to my post, &quot;Private investigators argue for conditional restraints on release of phone data&quot; (http://pibuzz.com/?p=594) to get a sense of what you call my &quot;unenlightened self interest&quot; and why licensed PIs with a permissible purpose should be able to access telephone subscriber information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reselling of customer telephone information on the public Internet should be stopped. I&#8217;d refer you back to my post, &#8220;Private investigators argue for conditional restraints on release of phone data&#8221; (http://pibuzz.com/?p=594) to get a sense of what you call my &#8220;unenlightened self interest&#8221; and why licensed PIs with a permissible purpose should be able to access telephone subscriber information.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Name</title>
		<link>http://pibuzz.com/2006/02/25/california-and-texas-follow-the-lead-of-other-states-criminalizing-sales-of-telephone-subscriber-data/#comment-30</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 03:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pibuzz.com/2006/02/25/california-and-texas-follow-the-lead-of-other-states-criminalizing-sales-of-telephone-subscriber-data/#comment-30</guid>
					<description>What does &quot;politician’s dream issue&quot; mean?  So these guys want to stop you from getting other peoples' phone records?  Dream issue?  How about this--independent of your unenlightened self interest, there are people who think you shouldn't be able to get these records.  Some of them happen to be elected officials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does &#8220;politician’s dream issue&#8221; mean?  So these guys want to stop you from getting other peoples&#8217; phone records?  Dream issue?  How about this&#8211;independent of your unenlightened self interest, there are people who think you shouldn&#8217;t be able to get these records.  Some of them happen to be elected officials.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
