February 28th, 2006

Anticipatory investigations

Pre-acceptance investigations are a potentially money saving investment for attorneys, mentioned by this personal injury lawyer, and could be a life-saver in complex cases. I’ve done these sort of stealth investigations, which gave the lawyer leverage in her negotiations, and sometimes settled matters for sizable amounts before a case was filed.

California PI Eric Mason, who worked on Michael Jackson’s defense, was profiled for his work on behalf of a local politician - investigating the government’s investigation.

Mason’s newest client is Perata, the unquestioned head of the East Bay political machine and target of a federal public corruption probe. Perata has racked up at least $39,000 in bills from Mason’s firm so far this year. Mason specializes in “pre-indictment investigations,” which basically are defense-team probes into what the government is investigating.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:Anticipatory investigations digg:Anticipatory investigations spurl:Anticipatory investigations wists:Anticipatory investigations simpy:Anticipatory investigations newsvine:Anticipatory investigations blinklist:Anticipatory investigations furl:Anticipatory investigations reddit:Anticipatory investigations fark:Anticipatory investigations blogmarks:Anticipatory investigations Y!:Anticipatory investigations smarking:Anticipatory investigations magnolia:Anticipatory investigations segnalo:Anticipatory investigations
February 28th, 2006

Search text within TV video

Not everything that’s on the web can be found through a general search engine. A fairly new development being utilized by blinkx.tv and TVeyes enables keyword searching of text in video that’s posted on the Internet. SearchEngineWatch gives a wrap up.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:Search text within TV video digg:Search text within TV video spurl:Search text within TV video wists:Search text within TV video simpy:Search text within TV video newsvine:Search text within TV video blinklist:Search text within TV video furl:Search text within TV video reddit:Search text within TV video fark:Search text within TV video blogmarks:Search text within TV video Y!:Search text within TV video smarking:Search text within TV video magnolia:Search text within TV video segnalo:Search text within TV video
February 26th, 2006

Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates

Legislative action to open the original birth certificates of adoptees is making its way through the Connecticut General Assembly. The bill, An Act Providing Adult Adopted Persons with Access to Information in Original Birth Certificates, would make the birth records available to the adoptee and to approved researchers. Maybe investigators or genealogists in Connecticut could comment on the requirements to be an approved party.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates digg:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates spurl:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates wists:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates simpy:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates newsvine:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates blinklist:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates furl:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates reddit:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates fark:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates blogmarks:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates Y!:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates smarking:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates magnolia:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates segnalo:Connecticut may open adoptee birth certificates
February 25th, 2006

California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data

The California legislature, adding its imprint to a politician’s dream issue, is considering Assembly Bill 2838, “an act to add Section 530.1 to the Penal Code, and to amend Section 2891 of the Public Utilities Code, relating to telephone records.”

If instituted this bill, codified as PC 530.1, offers 1 year in the slammer to any “person who willfully obtains a telephone calling pattern record or list of another person without that person’s consent…” Read the rest of this entry »

Pass it on: del.icio.us:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data digg:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data spurl:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data wists:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data simpy:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data newsvine:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data blinklist:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data furl:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data reddit:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data fark:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data blogmarks:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data Y!:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data smarking:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data magnolia:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data segnalo:California and Texas follow the lead of other states criminalizing sales of telephone subscriber data
February 24th, 2006

California divorce records under fire

An earlier attempt to seal California divorce records was dashed by an appellate court but a revised version is on the legeslative fast track, according to a report in the San Diego Union-Tribune.

Senate Bill 1015 would require elected and private judges seal financial records and personal identifiers, including residential addresses, contained in divorce filings.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, upon request by a party to a proceeding for dissolution of marriage, nullity of marriage, or legal separation, the court shall order sealed or redacted any portion of a pleading that lists the parties’ financial assets, liabilities, income or expenses, or provides the location of, including a residential address, or identifying information about, those assets, liabilities, income, or expenses.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:California divorce records under fire digg:California divorce records under fire spurl:California divorce records under fire wists:California divorce records under fire simpy:California divorce records under fire newsvine:California divorce records under fire blinklist:California divorce records under fire furl:California divorce records under fire reddit:California divorce records under fire fark:California divorce records under fire blogmarks:California divorce records under fire Y!:California divorce records under fire smarking:California divorce records under fire magnolia:California divorce records under fire segnalo:California divorce records under fire
February 24th, 2006

EPIC challenges attorneys’ use of private investigators

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) has been relentlessly hammering Congress and various regulatory bodies to outlaw pretexting and the sale of telephone subscriber information. EPIC is now trying to bring the American Bar Association and state Bar associations under their sway. In their letter to the Bar associations EPIC says that lawyers, via hired private investigators who engage in pretexting for any purpose, have committed an unethical act, in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

We believe that attorneys who hire investigators or other companies to engage in pretexting violate ethical norms.

The pressure is being applied by EPIC on public and private entities - through legal, legislative and regulatory channels - to restrict any method of information gathering that isn’t specifically allowed by law which they consider to be a violation of personal privacy.

We request that appropriate action be taken to ensure that attorneys in your state are not employing investigators or other companies to engage in pretexting or other fraud.

Read the rest of this entry »

Pass it on: del.icio.us:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators digg:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators spurl:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators wists:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators simpy:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators newsvine:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators blinklist:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators furl:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators reddit:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators fark:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators blogmarks:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators Y!:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators smarking:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators magnolia:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators segnalo:EPIC challenges attorneys' use of private investigators
February 23rd, 2006

Kern County Civil Index online

Kern County, California has its civil index accessible online. Civil and small claims actions are searchable by docket number, last name or partial last name. The inclusive dates are somewhat limited, as are the types of cases:

Cases that may not be online include Unlimited Civil and Family Law cases from 1996 and earlier and Limited Civil cases (including Unlawful Detainers and Small Claims cases) from July 2003 and earlier.

With all that said, I found Superior Court cases listed that were filed in the 1970s.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:Kern County Civil Index online digg:Kern County Civil Index online spurl:Kern County Civil Index online wists:Kern County Civil Index online simpy:Kern County Civil Index online newsvine:Kern County Civil Index online blinklist:Kern County Civil Index online furl:Kern County Civil Index online reddit:Kern County Civil Index online fark:Kern County Civil Index online blogmarks:Kern County Civil Index online Y!:Kern County Civil Index online smarking:Kern County Civil Index online magnolia:Kern County Civil Index online segnalo:Kern County Civil Index online
February 22nd, 2006

Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records

The Kansas Supreme Court met with mighty resistence when it tried to force Johnson County - the lone holdout - to comply with the fee-only access to statewide electronic court records. The persistent county has garnered the backing of the legislature for free access to the statewide electronic court index. Just to show who’s boss, the elected agents of the people propose to pay for the free online access with funds that were slated for judicial pay increases. Read all about it.

Pass it on: del.icio.us:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records digg:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records spurl:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records wists:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records simpy:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records newsvine:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records blinklist:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records furl:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records reddit:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records fark:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records blogmarks:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records Y!:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records smarking:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records magnolia:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records segnalo:Kansas county lobbies for free electronic court records
February 22nd, 2006

North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies

The North Dakota Attorney General has issued an opinion that a privately operated arts organization that received public funds is subject to the state’s open meetings and public records act. Read the rest of this entry »

Pass it on: del.icio.us:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies digg:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies spurl:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies wists:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies simpy:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies newsvine:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies blinklist:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies furl:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies reddit:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies fark:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies blogmarks:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies Y!:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies smarking:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies magnolia:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies segnalo:North Dakota AG: private entities may be subject to laws governing public agencies
February 22nd, 2006

So, what is a blog, anyway?

A blog is a web page of bite-sized information blurbs, news items and commentary that is frequently updated. Each entry is called a “post” and is arranged chronologically. Most blogs are tailored to a theme; PI buzz covers topics of interest and benefit to professional investigators and researchers.

Blogs are unique because they’re instant messages to the Internet and they invite the reader to become a participant.(Select the “Comments/No Comments” link at the end of any post and take a trial run. Don’t fear. You can’t break anything.)

Your participation and ideas for future posts keep PI buzz alive. Read the rest of this entry »

Pass it on: del.icio.us:So, what is a blog, anyway? digg:So, what is a blog, anyway? spurl:So, what is a blog, anyway? wists:So, what is a blog, anyway? simpy:So, what is a blog, anyway? newsvine:So, what is a blog, anyway? blinklist:So, what is a blog, anyway? furl:So, what is a blog, anyway? reddit:So, what is a blog, anyway? fark:So, what is a blog, anyway? blogmarks:So, what is a blog, anyway? Y!:So, what is a blog, anyway? smarking:So, what is a blog, anyway? magnolia:So, what is a blog, anyway? segnalo:So, what is a blog, anyway?